Spassky v Bronstein, 1960: the From Russia with Love game

Boris Spassky played this game against David Bronstein in the 27th USSR Championship in Leningrad in 1960. It is the game behind the chess scene at the start of the James Bond film From Russia with Love (1963), where the character Kronsteen wins with a version of its finish. Bronstein later regretted his first move, 1...e5: he had forgotten that Spassky liked the King's Gambit.

White to move after 14...e2. Black's pawn attacks the rook on f1, and Spassky ignored it.

The whole game

Spassky v Bronstein, USSR Championship 1960. Step through all 23 moves; Black resigned.

The opening is the King's Gambit, 2.f4. Stockfish doesn't think much of it, rating White about half a pawn worse after 2.f4, but it led to the kind of game Spassky wanted.

What Stockfish makes of it

We had Stockfish check every move. It agrees with Bruce Pandolfini, who wrote that an engine would probably question Spassky's famous sacrifice.

8...h6 and 9.Ne4

Bronstein said after the game that 8...Nf6, putting the knight where it would stop 9.Ne4, was better than 8...h6. Stockfish agrees, though the difference is small: the position is about level either way. Garry Kasparov wrote that Black's position was objectively defensible, but that the weak points on h7 and f7 got on Bronstein's nerves.

15.Nd6: the sacrifice

15.Nd6 Nf8 16.Nxf7! exf1=Q+ 17.Rxf1: Black is a rook up for a pawn, but White's pieces are all aimed at Black's king.

Black's pawn on e2 attacks the rook on f1, and taking it with promotion gives check. Spassky ignored it and played 15.Nd6. Bronstein had expected the quieter 15.Rf2. Andrew Soltis called 15.Nd6 one of the deepest sacrifices since the Evergreen Game.

Stockfish's verdict: the sacrifice wasn't sound. 15.Qxe2, simply taking the pawn, would have kept White nearly two pawns better. After 15.Nd6 Black could have held the balance with 15...Bxd6. Bronstein had calculated a better defence but rejected it, a moment of panic, and he said he still regretted it. After 15...Nf8 White is more than two pawns better, and 16.Nxf7, 17.Rxf1 and 18.Qxf5 were each the only move that kept it.

17...Bf5 and 20...Qe7

Bronstein's later moves made it worse. Stockfish prefers 17...Qd5 to 17...Bf5, and 20...Bxe5, which Kasparov also called the more practical move, to 20...Qe7. White would still have been winning.

The finish

21.Bb3 Bxe5 22.Nxe5+ Kh7 23.Qe4+: Black resigned. The film's Kronsteen finishes the same way.

After 23.Qe4+ Bronstein resigned, facing mate. In the film, Kronsteen plays Nxe5+, his opponent answers ...Kh7, Kronsteen plays Qe4+, and his opponent resigns. The film's position differs from the game's only in a few pawns.

How we checked

The moves are from the Exeter Chess Club, Zenón Franco's column in ABC Color and Bruce Pandolfini's article in Chess Life, which agree. We replayed every move with python-chess: all are legal.
The engine: Stockfish 16.1 checked every move at depth 22, and the key moments again at depth 26. "A pawn better" is Stockfish's measure of the position, not a count of material.
The history and the named opinions (Bronstein and Kasparov, via Franco; Soltis; Pandolfini) are from those sources and ChessBase.

Try it. Real positions, set at your level, every answer checked against the board. No account needed to start.

Start training