Levitsky v Marshall, Breslau 1912: the gold coins game
Frank Marshall, the leading American player of his day, played this game against Stepan Levitsky in the masters' tournament at Breslau (now Wrocław) on 20 July 1912. It is remembered for one move, 23...Qg3, and for a story: Marshall said that spectators showered the board with gold coins after it. The story is disputed. Marshall's wife Caroline is reported to have denied that even pennies were thrown, and others said any coins were paying off bets.
The whole game
What Stockfish makes of it
We had Stockfish check every move.
The opening: 3...c5
3...c5, which Marshall favoured at the time, is now considered dubious, and Stockfish agrees: Black is more than a pawn worse after it, against about a quarter of a pawn after 3...Nf6. White let some of that go with 4.Nf3, where Stockfish prefers 4.exd5, as does Nunn's Chess Openings.
20.Qh5: the losing move
After 19...Nd4 the game was still level. Levitsky played 20.Qh5, and Stockfish rates Black more than four pawns better after it. Pete Tamburro suggested 20.Qe4 instead, and Stockfish agrees that it holds the position level. Marshall then found the only strong reply, 20...Ref8, bringing the second rook to the f-file: every other move gives the advantage back.
23...Qg3: the queen that can be taken three ways
Black threatens 24...Qxh2#, and the queen on g3 can be taken three ways. Each loses:
Levitsky resigned. Annotators have given 23...Qg3 two or three exclamation marks, and Tim Krabbé ranked it the third most stunning move of all time. Christian Hesse disagreed, calling it overrated, because 23...Qb4 also wins. Stockfish takes a side: 23...Qg3 is the strongest move, about five pawns better for Black, but 23...Qb4, 23...Qa3 and 23...Qb2 all win too, each by more than four pawns.
How we checked
- The moves are from Wikipedia's page on the game. We replayed every one with python-chess: all are legal.
- The engine: Stockfish 16.1 checked every move at depth 22, and the key moments again at depth 24 to 26. "A pawn better" is Stockfish's measure of the position, not a count of material.
- The history and the named opinions (Tamburro, Krabbé, Hesse, the gold-coins story) are from the Wikipedia article.
Try it. Real positions, set at your level, every answer checked against the board. No account needed to start.
Start trainingMore famous games
- The Immortal Game
- The Evergreen Game
- The Opera Game
- Zukertort v Blackburne, London 1883
- Lasker v Bauer, Amsterdam 1889
- Steinitz v von Bardeleben, Hastings 1895
- Rotlewi v Rubinstein, Łódź 1907
- Edward Lasker v Thomas, London 1912
- Lasker v Capablanca, St Petersburg 1914
- Capablanca v Marshall, New York 1918
- Adams v Torre, 1920
- The Immortal Zugzwang Game
- Réti v Alekhine, Baden-Baden 1925
- Euwe v Alekhine, 1935, game 26
- Botvinnik v Capablanca, AVRO 1938
- The Game of the Century
- Polugaevsky v Nezhmetdinov, Sochi 1958
- Tal v Smyslov, Candidates 1959
- Spassky v Bronstein, 1960
- Tal v Botvinnik, 1960, game 1
- Robert Byrne v Fischer, 1963
- Petrosian v Spassky, 1966, game 10
- Spassky v Petrosian, 1969, game 19
- Larsen v Spassky, Belgrade 1970
- Fischer v Spassky, 1972, game 6
- Karpov v Spassky, 1974, game 9
- Liu Wenzhe v Donner, 1978
- Karpov v Kasparov, 1985, game 16
- Kasparov v Karpov, Seville 1987, game 24
- Shirov v Judit Polgár, Buenos Aires 1994
- Topalov v Shirov, Linares 1998
- Kasparov's Immortal
- Kasparov v Kramnik, 2000, game 3
- Kramnik v Leko, Brissago 2004, game 14
- Anand's Immortal
- Anand v Carlsen, Chennai 2013, game 9
- Wei Yi v Bruzón, Danzhou 2015
- Carlsen v Karjakin, 2016, tiebreak game 4
- Carlsen v Nepomniachtchi, 2021, game 6