Kasparov v Kramnik, 2000, game 3: the Berlin Wall
This game is famous not for a brilliant move but for an opening. In their world championship match in London in 2000, Vladimir Kramnik met Garry Kasparov's 1.e4 with the Berlin Defence of the Ruy Lopez, an old line that had fallen out of favour. The queens come off on move 8, and Black's king loses the right to castle, but Black's position is very hard to break. Kramnik played it in games 1, 3, 9 and 13 and drew all four; Kasparov never found a way through. Kramnik won the match 8½–6½ without losing a game and became world champion, and the Berlin became one of the most popular defences at the top level. This is game 3, played on 12 October 2000.
The whole game
What Stockfish makes of it
We had Stockfish check every move. It rates the opening as close to level, which is the Berlin's point.
Moves 32 to 34: chances on both sides
Reports of the game disagree on who had the chances. The Week in Chess wrote that Kasparov may have missed one; ChessBase wrote that Kasparov got into difficulties and escaped with a draw thanks to some luck. Stockfish sides with ChessBase. After 32.bxa4 Black was about a pawn better; 32.g3 would have kept the balance. Then Kramnik let it go: 34...Rxh6, exchanging rooks, would have kept Black more than a pawn better, and after 34...Rg8 the game was level again.
40.f7!: the only move
Just before the time control Kasparov found 40.f7, and Stockfish agrees it was the only move that held the balance: anything else would have left White about three pawns worse. Both players then found a run of only moves, 40...Nxf2, 41...Kd7, 42.Rxf8 and 43...Kxf7, and the pieces came off into a rook ending that was agreed drawn after 53...Ke5.
How we checked
- The moves: we found only one full published score, on German Wikipedia's page on the 2000 World Championship; its length, result, date and opening agree with English Wikipedia and The Week in Chess. We replayed every move with python-chess: all are legal.
- The engine: Stockfish 16.1 checked every move at depth 22, and the key moments again at depth 26. "A pawn better" is Stockfish's measure of the position, not a count of material.
- The history: from English Wikipedia's page on the Classical World Chess Championship 2000, The Week in Chess and ChessBase.
Try it. Real positions, set at your level, every answer checked against the board. No account needed to start.
Start trainingMore famous games
- The Immortal Game
- The Evergreen Game
- The Opera Game
- Zukertort v Blackburne, London 1883
- Lasker v Bauer, Amsterdam 1889
- Steinitz v von Bardeleben, Hastings 1895
- Rotlewi v Rubinstein, Łódź 1907
- Levitsky v Marshall, Breslau 1912
- Edward Lasker v Thomas, London 1912
- Lasker v Capablanca, St Petersburg 1914
- Capablanca v Marshall, New York 1918
- Adams v Torre, 1920
- The Immortal Zugzwang Game
- Réti v Alekhine, Baden-Baden 1925
- Euwe v Alekhine, 1935, game 26
- Botvinnik v Capablanca, AVRO 1938
- The Game of the Century
- Polugaevsky v Nezhmetdinov, Sochi 1958
- Tal v Smyslov, Candidates 1959
- Spassky v Bronstein, 1960
- Tal v Botvinnik, 1960, game 1
- Robert Byrne v Fischer, 1963
- Petrosian v Spassky, 1966, game 10
- Spassky v Petrosian, 1969, game 19
- Larsen v Spassky, Belgrade 1970
- Fischer v Spassky, 1972, game 6
- Karpov v Spassky, 1974, game 9
- Liu Wenzhe v Donner, 1978
- Karpov v Kasparov, 1985, game 16
- Kasparov v Karpov, Seville 1987, game 24
- Shirov v Judit Polgár, Buenos Aires 1994
- Topalov v Shirov, Linares 1998
- Kasparov's Immortal
- Kramnik v Leko, Brissago 2004, game 14
- Anand's Immortal
- Anand v Carlsen, Chennai 2013, game 9
- Wei Yi v Bruzón, Danzhou 2015
- Carlsen v Karjakin, 2016, tiebreak game 4
- Carlsen v Nepomniachtchi, 2021, game 6